Wednesday, May 15, 2019

Business law discussion #2 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Business law discussion 2 - test ExampleAfter the ban was upheld by the Second Circuit Court, a CIRCUIT SPLIT arose and the thought favored the complainant. The defendant made his appeal to the Supreme Court on grounds that the copyright clause known as FIRST-SALE DOCTRINE that authorized people residing in the United States to resell court-ordered substances was very much superior to the one that which required people to obtain the rights of the owners before dealing with their products in the United States. The Supreme Court overturned the decision of the Second Circuit and affirmed that Kirtsaeng was duly saved by the first-sale doctrine. The case is a demonstration of the powers invested in the Supreme Court and its ability to reverse the persuasion other courts deemed less superior to its judgment.The first element which is to make an offer was duly attained when surface-to-air missiles father wrote him a letter indicating his intention to transfer the Bentley to him. Sam acceptance of the offer categorically is a fulfilment of the second element of a contract. The third element which is the intention to enter into legal consequences is however lacking which makes the contract not a binding one and this explains why Sam lead not be successful in the suit. It follows that at that place is no consideration in the contract which violates the fourth and final element of a binding contract. Promissory Estoppel which can be applied as a substitute to consideration may act in favor of Sam in an event that there was no legally binding contract between him and his father. This is in line with one of the elements which considers refusal of Sams father to transfer the Bentley to him as an act of injustice.In the case of Lucy, the body of contract law that lead be applied by the court is that of voidable contract in which the contract is enforceable at the option of one of the parties involved. In this case, Lucy who was the aggrieved party had the option to either accept or

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.